Search for: "CHAMBER v. STATE"
Results 401 - 420
of 5,329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2023, 6:18 am
Subsequently, in the Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 1:20 am
The ECtHR Grand Chamber judgment in Fedotova v Russia on the legal recognition of same-sex couples. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:40 pm
The first case, Biden v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:30 am
The State Legislature can refer constitutional amendments to the ballot by a two-thirds supermajority vote in each chamber. [read post]
European Court Says Russia Violated Rights of Same Sex Couples Who Were Denied Marriage Registration
31 Jan 2023, 4:10 am
In Fedotova and Others v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:32 am
Background In Fedotova and Others v Russia [2023] ECHR 55, the six applicants formed three same-sex couples: two female and one male. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:31 am
IndiaState v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
In 1984, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called Graham v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am
These are the folks who would want to roll back segregation, for whom Loving v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
These cases demonstrate clearly the change of position as compared with Allianz v West Tankers and Turner v Grovit, respectively. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:48 am
” Examples featured on this blog include the decision by Justice Saliann Scarpulla (then a Manhattan Commercial Division judge, later elevated to the appellate bench) in Advanced 23, LLC v Chamber House Partners, LLC and retired Justice Charles Ramos’s decision in Goldstein v Pikus. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:43 am
In this post, Ross Ludlow, Legal Support Assistant at Matrix Chambers, comments on the case of R v Maughan (Northern Ireland) [2022] UKSC 13. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
” Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 4:01 am
Hell, Brown v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 1:38 am
The whole multi-hour event was nothing but a thinly-veiled call from Brussels on the Luxembourg-based 15 judges of the Grand Chamber to reject the (actually well-reasoned and balanced) opinion AG Athanasios Rantos handed down in the European Superleague Company v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 5:56 am
Ukraine v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 11:19 am
United States, 139 S.Ct. 2116, 2123 (U.S., 2019) (citing Mistretta v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 11:19 am
United States, 139 S.Ct. 2116, 2123 (U.S., 2019) (citing Mistretta v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 6:08 am
At present, the Carnahan v. [read post]
