Search for: "CORN v. STATE" Results 401 - 420 of 653
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Owens Corning Corp., 964 F.2d 92 (2d Cir. 1992) Maiorana v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:40 am by Milen Hristov
In its decision on the case Johannes Gerrit Cornelis van Schaik v Hoge Raad der Nederlanden  in Para  21 the Court has ruled that: ...Article 4 of the directive further provides that the roadworthiness tests, within the meaning of the directive, are to be carried out by the State or by bodies or establishments designated and directly supervised by the State. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:06 am
In yesterday's post, I highlighted the conclusions in the recent report published by the Emory International Humanitarian Law Clinic, which I direct, on the application of international humanitarian law in the April 15, 2011, judgment of Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in the case of Prosecutor v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:39 am by Guest Blogger
  Construing a state regulation as “environmental” doesn’t insulate it from Commerce Clause review, as the town of Clarkstown, New York found out in C&A Carbone, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:14 pm
The court found that LCFS impermissibly discriminates against out-of-state corn ethanol and impermissibly regulates beyond California in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause doctrine.[1] LCFS assigns carbon intensity scores for gasoline and gasoline substitutes. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm by Jeff Lorenzo
” On this claim the Court found that the LCFS discriminates against out-of-state corn-derived ethanol and impermissibly regulates extraterritorial conduct. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Steve Szentesi
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am by admin
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:27 am by Xandra Kramer
Cornelis A. de Visser, The law governing the voluntary assignment of claims under the Rome I Regulation, p. 461-467. [read post]