Search for: "CTS Corporation"
Results 401 - 420
of 3,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2020, 11:34 am
Ct. 1773, 1780, the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 8:15 am
Form CT-1 The modification to Form CT-1 includes replacing the question that referenced fiscal sponsorship (see our discussion of the problem with the question here). [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 12:21 pm
It's a decision that affirms a multi-million dollar civil penalty against corporate officials under the responsible corporate officer doctrine. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 11:43 pm
Ct. 1185 (March 5, 2007) (Ginsburg, J., for a unanimous Court):The underlying controversy concerns alleged misrepresentations by a Chinese corporation to a Chinese admiralty court resulting in the arrest of a Malaysian vessel in China. . . .. . .The District Court [Eastern District of Pennsylvania] first determined that it had subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 11:43 pm
Ct. 1185 (March 5, 2007) (Ginsburg, J., for a unanimous Court):The underlying controversy concerns alleged misrepresentations by a Chinese corporation to a Chinese admiralty court resulting in the arrest of a Malaysian vessel in China. . . .. . .The District Court [Eastern District of Pennsylvania] first determined that it had subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:17 am
While the decision certainly removed certain formal barriers to the influence of corporate dollars in federal elections, it’s doctrinal impact on corporations was rather limited. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:10 am
Ct. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
In the world of closely held corporations, what makes a shareholder a shareholder? [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:15 am
Ct. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
Ct. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:00 am
The petitioner relied heavily on Matter of Bunzl, 224 AD2d 245 (1st Dept 1996), where the court refused to compel arbitration of a dispute concerning the ownership of a constituent corporate shareholder under the arbitration clause contained in the shareholders' agreement of the upstream corporation. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 9:03 am
Ct. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
Austin (recently elevated to Associate Justice of the Second Department), who denied Goldberg's injunction motion in a decision reported at 15 Misc 3d 1142(A), 2007 NY Slip Op 51117(U) (Sup Ct Nassau County 2007). [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:06 am
Ct. 1937, 1949 (May 18, 2009)]. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 6:05 am
Ct., Oct. 9, 2009), involved a dispute over which of two factions in a Vancouver congregation in the Canadian province of British Columbia was entitled to control over $280,000 of church funds. [read post]
11 May 2013, 6:00 am
Ct. 1289, 1293 (2012). [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 6:07 am
Lobbying New York: “NY State Ethics Watchdog Investigating Nonprofit with Ties to Large Corporate Political Donor” by Larry Kaplan for Nonprofit Quarterly Campaign Finance “Sanders’ New Group Exempt from Campaign Finance Laws” by Jasper Craven for VTDigger.org Florida: “On 2nd Try, Miami-Dade Commissioners Approve Petition Count” by Douglas Hanks for Miami Herald Ethics Connecticut: “Malloy Releases Funds Withheld from CT Watchdog… [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:14 am
.), Short Form Order, Index No. 29627-2013 [Sup Ct, Suffolk County Apr. 22, 2014], Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines issued a decision dismissing a petition for judicial dissolution of a New York-based, Delaware corporation on the ground the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:22 am
McIntosh, Short Form Order, Index No. 001683/09 (Sup Ct Nassau County Jan. 19, 2011). [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:25 pm
(“Quotient”), a close corporation organized under Maryland law, in 2001. [read post]
