Search for: "Chapter Two Communications, Inc." Results 401 - 420 of 647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Concerning retiree-only coverage, the Preamble states: Although group health plans that have fewer than two participants who are current employees (such as retiree-only plans) are excluded from the requirements of Code chapter 100 (setting forth requirements applicable to group health plans such as portability, nondiscrimination, and market reform requirements), this exclusion does not apply to Code §§ 4375 and 4376 because these sections are in chapter… [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:33 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
These issues were dealt with by the Ontario Court of Appeal recently in L-3 Communications Spar Aerospace Limited v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:17 pm by WIMS
BP broke two major laws that have two very important purposes, and they should pay for violating both. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 12:36 pm by WIMS
And it flows through so many urban and suburban communities playing the role of natural and recreational resource and catalyst for community revitalization. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 1:17 am by Sam Antar
He received one-year probation and 100 hours of community service as a sentence. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 1:16 pm by WIMS
[#Land, #Climate]   GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS (click here)32 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental ProfessionalsWaste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:02 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Although many mandates have taken effect over the past two years, few employer plans are adequately updated. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:09 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
In L-3 Communications, the agreement in question contained no details about the mediation process. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 2:58 pm by Thomas Heintzman
In L-3 Communications, the agreement in question contained no details about the mediation process. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am by Howard Knopf
There has never been a rule that copying more than a sentence or two is infringing – despite occasional suggestions by some who urge otherwise. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 7:17 am by Schachtman
Ensign– Bickford Indus., Inc., 168 F.Supp. 2d 1271, 1282 (D. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:52 pm by SO Issues
"To broadly prohibit such a large group of persons from ever using these modern forms of communication is just something the First Amendment cannot tolerate," said Ken Falk, legal director of Indiana's ACLU chapter. [read post]