Search for: "Cole v State" Results 401 - 420 of 1,195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm by Smita Ghosh
In the NYRB, David Cole’s How Voting Rights Are Being Rigged covers Give Us the Ballot: The Modern Struggle for Voting Rights in America by Ari Berman and The Great Suppression: Voting Rights, Corporate Cash, and the Conservative Assault on Democracy by Zachary Roth. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 11:08 pm by Joanna Vincent
”[3] It also clearly stated that a positive test for illicit drugs could result in dismissal. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Of the justices now on the Court, Samuel Alito seems the most likely to find merit in legal protection for animals, based on his solo dissent in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
This owes, in large part, to the High Court of Australia’s unanimous decision[1]in Cole v Whitfield (1988) 165 CLR 360. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:29 pm by Emma Durand-Wood
Colleague Dan Coles blogged a 2-part piece on liquor law appeals, focusing on judicial reviews and their role in a pair of recent cases involving pubs on Vancouver Island. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:29 pm by Emma Durand-Wood
Colleague Dan Coles blogged a 2-part piece on liquor law appeals, focusing on judicial reviews and their role in a pair of recent cases involving pubs on Vancouver Island. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:29 pm by Emma Durand-Wood
Colleague Dan Coles blogged a 2-part piece on liquor law appeals, focusing on judicial reviews and their role in a pair of recent cases involving pubs on Vancouver Island. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:30 am
He was one of the lead lawyers in the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Romer v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm by Sandy Levinson
 Even the Supreme Court prefers to treat Bush v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Felipe Cole, Northwestern University, “Latin American Debt and the Rise of Sovereign Receivership. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]