Search for: "Cooper v. United States of America" Results 401 - 420 of 743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Applera Corp (Patently-O) (271 Patent Blog) District Court S D Indiana: Stay pending reexam lifted prior to issuance of reexam certificate (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: United States is not an indispensible party to false marking action: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am by dawn
A 2013 Senate investigation found that Apple has structured two Irish subsidiaries to be tax residents of neither the United States, where they are managed and controlled, nor Ireland, where they are incorporated. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Charles Dickens did this, but his heavy schedule of public performances in the United States, where his works were not protected by copyright, arguably contributed to his untimely death.Dickens visited the United States twice. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
– ASA rules competition promoters can offer third party products as prizes without consent (IPKat) The UK is still in the IP thought leadership game (IAM) United States US General US/UK Intellectual Property Office statement on cooperation (Patent Baristas) USPTO year in review – and a look forward (Director’s Forum) NASA needs you! [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 8:28 am by Ben
Circuit Has recently faced in the dispute between Spanski Enterprises v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Steve Gottlieb
Harris Cooperation Coporate responsibility Corporate responsibility Corporate responsibility corporate rights Corporation for Public Broadcasting Corruption Cost of cost of Cost-benefit calculation Coups Covid 19 Crawford v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
We believe that a trade agreement, drafted correctly, would benefit the United States on the one hand, and the countries of Central America and the Dominican Republic, on the other. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  All the while, of course, the national citizenry has basically remained asleep, acceding to Madison’s devout wish, in Federalist 40, that they “venerate” the United States Constitution and, in effect, never even think of having a second national convention. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:43 pm
UNI has signed over 50 Global Agreements with multinational companies to secure respect for workers’ rights in Africa, the Americas, Asia Pacific and Europe. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 6:02 pm by Larry Ribstein
J. 857, 870-73 (2009); United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm by Tobias Lutzi
In BMW of North America, Inc v Gore (517 US 559 (1996)), she dissented from another decision reviewing an allegedly excessive punitive-damages award and argued that the Court should ‘resist unnecessary intrusion into an area dominantly of state concern. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 12:14 pm
She is concerned that if such imprecise language continues there will be a PR frenzy of Europe v America in the Google Book saga â€" a battle that the US will be destined to lose if equated solely with Google’s stated position. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]