Search for: "Correction Officer J. May" Results 401 - 420 of 2,329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2016, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian published an alarmist report about parents of transgender children living in fear in the aftermath of J (A Minor). [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 8:00 am by Eric Segall
Over the next year or so, numerous courts (and state election officials) are going to be asked to disqualify Donald J. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 2:00 am by Guest Author
Thus, what the reader may initially find jarring sharpens the stakes and clarifies what is missing from so many of our debates of bureaucracy and democracy. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:04 am by Yosi Yahoudai
The proposed ballot measure in California has so far received at least a quarter of the more than 500,000 signatures it needs by May 28 to end up on the ballot in November, according to the secretary of state’s office. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
If Justice Scalia and the Respondents are correct, members of Congress cannot serve as Speakers and Senate Presidents Pro Tempore, because those positions are "Offices under the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:05 am by Nedim Malovic
Hence, the Hearing Officer’s findings were correct on this point.Acquired distinctivenessHaving established that inherent distinctiveness does not subsist in relation to the marks in question, the Court moved on to consider acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 4:25 pm
Kennedy issued his decision Feb. 3, 2005. *** Double J. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 3:59 pm
Since the claimant alleges that a body or officer failed to perform a duty enjoined upon it by law, the respondents are clearly correct. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:14 am by Steve Hall
" "Correct," respondent San Quentin's information officer Lieutenant Samuel Robinson. [read post]
(Petro Poroshenko is the predecessor of President Zelensky, and was in office at the time of Shokin’s dismissal.) [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The changes mean the government may not apply the code to Facebook if the company can demonstrate it has signed enough deals with media outlets to pay them for content. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:18 am by davidharrisauthor
”   These descriptions seem correct, since the FBI has been one of the law enforcement agencies most resistant in the U.S. to change on this issue. [read post]