Search for: "Cross v. Powers"
Results 401 - 420
of 4,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court had granted the District's cross-motion, in effect denying the Plaintiffs petition and dismissed the proceeding. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court had granted the District's cross-motion, in effect denying the Plaintiffs petition and dismissed the proceeding. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:42 pm
The Court rejects Lundbeck’s argument that the FTC must present evidence of cross-elasticities in order to survive summary judgment. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:15 pm
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Petersongs v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) pending from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz(Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v Telenet (Belgium).Questions about injunctions against intermediaries are also raised in… [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55: Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
There was no suggestion that AA had not co-operated with attempts by the SSHD, and the Red Cross, to trace his family in Afghanistan. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
The leading one he cites is Geduldig v. [read post]
6 Oct 2012, 7:43 am
In Longus v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 10:29 pm
(v) Does the power under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 extend to persons not named in the FIR or named in the FIR but not charged or who have been discharged? [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:00 am
The ruling in the case, Wandry v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am
Compare Bland v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:17 am
” Rule 15 – crossing situation “When two power-driven vessels are crossing so as to involve risk of collision, the vessel which has the other on her own starboard side shall keep out of the way and shall, if the circumstances of the case admit, avoid crossing ahead of the other vessel. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 9:55 am
The case is In Re Border Infrastructure Environmental Litigation (Center for Biological Diversity, et al., v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:36 am
Again, both experts were at cross-purposes. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:55 pm
Perhaps the most infamous example of how corporate power has been advanced through the strategies seeded by Powell is last year’s Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:58 pm
Co v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:07 am
Circuit in its FTC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
The expert comes into trial and is subject to cross-examination. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Emma Boffey, Rory Thomson, Shona McCusker, Sian McNiff, Kenneth Rose, Emma Cross, Will Anderson, Mitchell Abbott, Felicity Bramall and Jennifer Love, all from CMS. 16:01: Lady Hale thanks the parties for the swiftness of their submissions and notes that the Court will adjourn until 10.30am tomorrow. 16:00: Lord Keen QC rests his submissions. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 1:26 pm
Legislative veto This amendment would reverse INS v. [read post]
