Search for: "DOE V US"
Results 401 - 420
of 95,819
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2008, 4:37 pm
US v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:05 am
In Baker v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 11:15 am
How many types of fruit does one mega-company need to protect its trademarks? [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 9:14 am
Ward v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 11:13 am
In R v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:40 am
The European Court of Justice has ruled that a trade mark used in relation to free promotion items does not constitute genuine use. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:59 pm
301-6.C(v) & (viii). [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:21 am
So, I'm sure we'll all have a lot more to say here, but the opinion in Skilling v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 9:20 am
The recent opinion of the Seventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:40 am
The European Court of Justice has ruled that a trade mark used in relation to free promotion items does not constitute genuine use. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 1:57 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:53 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its eagerly anticipated rulling in Nordyke v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:58 pm
by Matthew Hinks Spot zoning - the practice of singling out a parcel of property for either more or less restrictive zoning regulations - does not always constitute an impermissible abuse of discretion according to a new opinion from the California Court of Appeal in Foothill Communities Coalition v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:04 am
Gomez v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:31 am
Justice Fischer’s Dissent Justice Fischer thinks a deposition does fall within the meaning of “proceeding” as that term is used in R.C. 2303.21. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
"*In the Nissen case the Washington Supreme Court considered a similar issue: Does the PRA apply when a public employee uses a private cell phone to conduct government business? [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day, A.O.A. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:50 pm
National Australia Bank Ltd does not strip investors in US companies who purchased their shares overseas of securities fraud protections under US law if the shares were dual listed, say Israel’s securities regulation authority and a group of Israeli investors. [read post]
