Search for: "DOES 1-2,000"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 6:24 pm
The amount of the payment for the month equals the number of full-time employees the employer employed for the month (minus up to 30) multiplied by 1/12 of $2,000. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 10:32 am
Multiple that by each child if you have more than 1 child. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:03 pm
The current financial rules for eligibility are: If you are an individual: you must have less than $2,000 in resources, can only own 1 automobile, can only own 1 home (must be your primary residence). [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 7:51 am
The good news is that this does not affect the amounts that the company can raise in other exempt (non-crowdfunding) offerings during that same 12-month period. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:06 pm
The article was created for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute legal advice. [read post]
14 May 2020, 5:00 pm
Instead, the employer, in its discretion, may adopt one or more changes and may limit changes, provided it does so in a manner that does not discriminate in favor of highly compensated employees. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm
Comstock, 1 AD3d 307, 308). [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 8:03 am
There was at least $2,000 total in property damage, either to the vessel or other property. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:48 am
Today’s final rule will:Expand the definition of “small creditor”: The loan origination limit for small-creditor status will be raised from 500 first-lien mortgage loans to 2,000 and will exclude loans held in portfolio by the creditor and its affiliates.Include mortgage affiliates in calculation of small-creditor status: The final rule does not change the current asset limit for small-creditor status, which is set at less than $2 billion (adjusted… [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
Upon discovery of these and various other related cup designs George East again objected and ultimately issued proceedings for passing off in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) in London: George East Housewares Ltd v Fackelmann Gmbh & Co KG & Anor [2016] EWHC 2476.The get-up - interiorIn a passing off case, there are three issues which the court needs to determine (the so-called classic Trinity):1 Does the claimant have goodwill (and if so in what… [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
[RPEA] v Cuomo decisionThe Retired Public Employees Association [RPEA] challenged the State's reduction of the percentage of its employer contribution towards health insurance premiums with respect to “pre-contract” State retirees, contending that: [1] Civil Service Law §167.1 sets out the ratio of employer contributions the State was required to make on behalf on these pre-contract State retirees and that provision was not amended to provide for a different… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 7:36 pm
The Department aims to complete processing of all applications no later than May 1, 2024. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:02 am
Unfortunately, that period does not begin until you are left with only $2,000 in countable assets. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:02 am
Unfortunately, that period does not begin until you are left with only $2,000 in countable assets. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:34 pm
The credit is allowed for 100% of the first $2,000 of qualifying expenses, plus 25% of the next $2,000. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:48 am
Two nice things that Skeel does in the book is to identify two objectives to think about with DF. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:34 am
The research, involving 2,000 teen-agers who provided anonymous replies to questionnaires, also finds that vaping does not help those who already smoke stop by providing an alternative. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 11:01 am
If Al is convicted for his first offense, he can expect a fine of up to $2,000, jail time of 3 days to six months and a suspended license for 90 days to 1 year. [read post]
31 May 2017, 2:01 pm
If you or someone you love has been injured a Boston drunk driving accident, call for a free and confidential appointment at 1-888-367-2900. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 6:07 am
By that she means two things: 1) the Hyde Amendment prohibits the use of federal funds, with some exceptions, to pay for abortions; and 2) she does not interpret the Senate's version of health reform as allowing federal funding of abortion. [read post]
