Search for: "DOES 1-4" Results 401 - 420 of 60,730
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2015, 12:39 pm by LaJuana Davis
<img src="//feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EducationLawProfBlog/~4/z6Aj4pXiWVE" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 8:28 am by Tracy Thomas
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GenderAndTheLawBlog/~4/htVj2uDVoZs" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 12:56 pm
Strieff, and calling to mind 1984's Winston Smith: "Does 1 + 1 = 3? [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 1:25 pm by LaJuana Davis
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EducationLawProfBlog/~4/nCHRBkiCVkE" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:31 pm by Shea Denning
  A person who (1) drives (2) a vehicle (3) on a street, highway, or public vehicular area within the State, (4) while under the influence of an impairing substance commits the offense of misdemeanor DWI. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:57 pm
What does a USPTO Search Look Like? [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Contrary to the argumentation of the Appellant, claim 1 does indeed relate to a specific composition, as supported by the description wherein the amounts of 46% of R125 and 4% of R600 in claim 1 find support in the application as filed as one of the “specific formulations” (emphasis added) described on page 4, lines 10 to 16 and in the particular formulation of Example 1, only, there being no suggestion in the patent specification… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:06 pm by V.Venkatesan
How does the above Bill affect the work load of the Supreme Court? [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2004).AndThe decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11-20,36, 39-41, and 43-48 is AFFIRMED.This decision contains several new grounds of rejection pursuant to 37C.F.R. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 11:15 am
Sometimes, however, the court of appeal takes out its red pen and edits the judgment, as 4/1 does in this case today: http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/D058769.PDF This specific and hands-on approach certainly removes any ambiguity about the outcome. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 3:33 am
How does an $85 patent you file yourself sound? [read post]