Search for: "Department of Commerce v. New York" Results 401 - 420 of 824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am by Tinker Ready
Dror is a researcher at University College London, frequently teaching at agencies like the FBI and New York Police Department on ways to minimize personal beliefs from influencing casework. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 6:41 am by Eric Goldman
As part of its ongoing crackdown on short-term lodging, New York City passed an anti-Airbnb ordinance scheduled to take effect next month. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the challengers in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Another look at the possible effect of the ruling on the pending Supreme Court case, Department of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
  New Relists Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
City of New York, New York, 18-280, is similarly high-profile. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
The change was sparked by a decision by a federal judge in New York who ruled that the key verse in the song was not protected under copyright for lack of originality. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm by Amy Howe
The February sitting begins on February 19 with Department of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
After investigating Facebook’s internal documents, The New York Times alleged that Facebook broke its privacy agreements with users. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
  Selikoff arrived in New York, from Liverpool, London, on the S.S. [read post]
When the OCC announced its interest in chartering fintech companies, lawsuits were brought by both the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS), the nationwide organization of financial regulators, and Maria Vullo, the Superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Green's Energy Group, where the Supreme Court held it is not unconstitutional for the Patent Trial & Appeals Board (PTAB), an agency in the Department of Commerce, to hear post-issuance challenges to patents, without the process and protections of an Article III court. [read post]