Search for: "Doctor v. United States of America" Results 401 - 420 of 438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
------------------------"The United States incarcerates more people than any country in the world," said the Pew Center on the States, in a report released February 28, 2008, One in 100: Behind Bars In America 2008. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am by Schachtman
Kevin Elliott received his doctorate in the History and Philosophy of Science (Notre Dame), and he is currently an Associate Professor in Michigan State University. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:50 am by Gordon Ahl
A panel of experts will offer perspectives from Southeast Asia, Europe, India and Japan on the ways the United States and its allies can push against China’s activities. [read post]
13 May 2018, 2:20 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
When faced with a claim of juror bias, Remmer v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya that… [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
The haunted house requires participants to get a doctor’s note and sign a 40-page waiver before they enter. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:16 pm
  And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. [read post]
In short, the judge concludes that the plaintiffs have standing to bring this case either on their own behalf as doctors who do not prescribe the drug but are harmed by complications that can “overwhelm the medical system” or lead them to be complicit in “elective chemical abortion” or on behalf of patients who are harmed by medication abortion but unable to vindicate their own interests in litigation. [read post]