Search for: "Does, 1-13" Results 401 - 420 of 21,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2012, 3:20 pm by Rekha Arulanantham, ACLU
Which Constitutional amendment does an Oklahoma law that discriminates against Muslims violate? [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 1:50 pm by Tony Lee
  The extension to December 13, 2013 does not resolve those requests. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 10:07 am
The Las Vegas Review Journal has requested permission to take still photographs during oral argument in the Halverson Judicial Discipline appeal which is to be heard by the Nevada Supreme Court on September 13, 2007 at 1 p.m. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 12:17 am
The crux of the Communication from South AfricaThe South African Government posed specific questions for Member States’ consideration thus:1) Does the three-step test constitute an indivisible whole to the extent that each of the three steps are to be considered together and as a whole in a comprehensive overall assessment? [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:06 am
***The IPKat's DSM Directive SeriesDSM Directive Series #1: Do Member States have to transpose the value gap provision and does the YouTube referral matter? [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 1:12 pm
The named plaintiff, Tim Doe #1 (plaintiff),  was one of those children. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 2:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
We thus affirm the Board’s rejection of claims 113 for obviousness. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 1:37 pm by Clay Holland
For starters, does a bankruptcy petition really expire? [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm by Venkat
Wash.; Oct. 13, 2011) An actress who goes by a stage name sued IMDB and Amazon for disclosing her birthdate, which IMDB allegedly obtained through the payment process. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:46 pm
Direct Wholesalers,Inc., John Doe 1-5 Case Number: 0:2008cv60339 The Lake Doctors, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by umbrella
Call us at 1-844-769-0737, or contact us online to schedule an initial consultation. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by umbrella
Call us at 1-844-769-0737, or contact us online to schedule an initial consultation. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am by Roel van Woudenberg
On 12 February 2008 the USPTO, not being competent under Rule 19(1)(2) PCT to receive the international application, transmitted the latter pursuant to Rule 19.4 PCT to the International Bureau of WIPO as receiving Office (IB/RO), which assigned it a new international application number (PCT/IB2005/004218) and informed the original applicant by communication dated 13 June 2008. [read post]