Search for: "Does 1 to 100, inclusive" Results 401 - 420 of 842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2024, 5:05 am by Simon Lester
The commitment also entails the creation of 1 million jobs in the said period (Article 7.1.3 (b)). [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:05 am by Simon Lester
The commitment also entails the creation of 1 million jobs in the said period (Article 7.1.3 (b)). [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 9:26 pm
Directories "refer" users to a lawyer's website or phone number and lawyers pay a fee for inclusion for the very purpose of receiving those referrals. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 7:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Although RCP can’t occur in 100% water pressurized pipe, the inclusion of a small amount of air in a pipe could enable RCP failure. [read post]
3 May 2007, 2:53 pm
  Such a broad range of possibilities suggests that the industry simply does not know. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:02 pm by Schachtman
The defense brief unfortunately does not describe the studies excluded, and what, if any, effect their inclusion in the meta-analysis would have had. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Kent Services Ltd.19 The rule was effectively applied 100 years ago by the House of Lords in TW Thomas & Co. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's contribution rate changed in 1983 after CSEA and other unions representing state employees reached a memorandum of understating (MOU), reducing that rate for individual coverage from 100% to 90%. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's contribution rate changed in 1983 after CSEA and other unions representing state employees reached a memorandum of understating (MOU), reducing that rate for individual coverage from 100% to 90%. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:45 pm by Dan Carvajal
Isn’t that the kind of inclusive growth that all of us could support? [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm by Giles Peaker
Does the policy have a legitimate aim of sufficient importance that it could justify a restriction on the claimant’s right not to be discriminated against? [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 2:18 am by Kevin LaCroix
’33 Act Allegations: After controlling for the presence of underwriter defendants and controlling for other factors, the inclusion of ’33 Act claims does not result in a statistically significant increase in settlement amounts. [read post]