Search for: "Don E. Williams" Results 401 - 420 of 1,666
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am by Jason Rantanen
First, unlike changing the law or its application which requires all to adjust, only applicants dissatisfied with the status quo would see a change. 85% of office actions don’t even include a PSM rejection I’ve found previously. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 5:02 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   The January 2, 2019 Decision In an order filed on January 2, 2019, Judge William F. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:45 am by Bob Ambrogi
Meredith Williams-Range, Chief Knowledge & Value Officer – Shearman and Sterling. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
May 25, 2006) ("[W]e find that appellant's being called a racist was a matter of one employee's opinion and thus is constitutionally protected speech, not subject to a defamation claim. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:01 am by Kevin O'Keefe
  …[W]e’ve grown ever more aware of the problems with centralizing the internet. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Stephen Bates
Prosecutors, special and unspecial, routinely conclude that wrongdoing and even lawbreaking occurred, but they don’t always prosecute it. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:19 am by Dennis Kennedy
I don’t list books that might reveal certain things I might (or might not) be working on. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:07 am by SHG
There are no doubt additional costs, as galas don’t come cheap, and yet they don’t appear to cost $500,000 either. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 1:59 pm by Coral Beach
One reason cited for that expectation is the rule of thumb that people generally don’t eat romaine just one time, or from just one source before becoming ill. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:13 am by Jim Baker, Sarah Grant
On Oct. 20, 1973, Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus resigned rather than follow President Nixon’s order to fire Cox; Acting Attorney General Robert Bork then fired Cox. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
This three-part series looks at intriguing constitutional questions raised by California’s statutory enactment of SB 826, which requires publicly held corporations with principal executive offices located in California to have a prescribed number of women on their boards of directors. [read post]