Search for: "Don Marks" Results 401 - 420 of 26,638
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
You don't need to be a lawyer or journalist to file these; you just have to care. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 9:13 am
"’If you get rid of TikTok, Facebook and Zuckerschmuck will double their business,' Trump, 77, claimed in a Truth Social post, apparently referring to Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg. 'I don’t want Facebook, who cheated in the last Election, doing better. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 8:00 pm by AccelerateEditor
Be sure to take photographs of the accident site, including vehicle damage, skid marks, traffic signs, and any visible injuries. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Second Circuit: Those aren't names, and if you don't name names, you don't have associational standing to sue on their behalf. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:03 am by Mark Burridge
My job is to make sure they don’t get a shot on goal. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:06 am by centerforartlaw
I follow the impact and direction of the formal elements—the mark, the edge, the shape, the color, the composition—to create a unique visual and emotional experience based on my way of seeing. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 7:34 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
As Forbes contributor Mark Travers recently wrote, time poverty also encapsulates a subjective sense of being overwhelmed due to constantly feeling rushed or pressured. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:07 am by thomasgalvani
  Except for a very few situations, if you don’t use a trademark, you cannot have rights in that trademark. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:00 am by Simon Lester
And so this very complex, it happens at the six year mark, if you don't have agreement, you have 10 years for it to peter out, if it renews it's another X number of years. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:00 am by Simon Lester
And so this very complex, it happens at the six year mark, if you don't have agreement, you have 10 years for it to peter out, if it renews it's another X number of years. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
” While there’s no reason Section 230 couldn’t apply to digital items sold by the defendant, I don’t see how 230 can apply equally to offline physical items. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
 Nevertheless, the Court’s resolution was ingenious, in that (as I explained here) it reached the right result while not adopting any of the lousy arguments Trump himself had offered; allowed the Court to avoid opining on questions related to Trump’s constitutional eligibility to serve again as President (or in any other covered office); and at the same time preserved the power of states to do two other things that presumably don’t trouble the Justices… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 12:30 am by Jared Staver
They are subjective losses that don’t have a clear monetary value. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
Start it at the 30 second mark.)Regardless, today's opinion is uniquely Californian, I think. [read post]