Search for: "Duke Power Company" Results 401 - 420 of 633
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Third Arbitration Trilogy: Stolt-Nielsen, Rent-A-Center, Concepcion and the Future of American Arbitration American Review of International Arbitration, 2012Thomas Stipanowich Pepperdine University School of Law Abstract: For the third time in the modern era, a triad of key Supreme Court decisions represents a milestone in American arbitration. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:15 am by Rob Robinson
- http://bit.ly/pXoa7U (Jan Wolfe) What’s a Company’s Biggest #Security Risk? [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
” After Gushlak was sent to prison, according to the affidavit, Furman acted for Gushlak under a power of attorney. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Yelnosky Roger Williams University School of Law Date Posted: August 10, 2011Accepted Paper Series24 downloadsAbstract: There is a widely-shared belief that the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act has resulted in a doctrine that is far too solicitous of arbitration and not sufficiently solicitous of state lawmaking power. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:32 am by Sarah Crawford
Reforms like these have the power to transform corporate culture, policies and practices. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:35 am by Lucie Olejnikova
(A Cabin Creek film production 2006) [HD5325.M62 1973 .H37 2006 DVD] – Chronicles the 1973 Harlan County, Kentucky coal miners’ strike against the operators of the Brookside mine and the Duke Power Company, which resulted from the company’s refusal to honor the national contract of the United Mine Workers of America when the miners joined the union. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:28 am by Neil S. Siegel
Siegel, Professor of Law and Political Science and Co-Director of the Program in Public Law at Duke Law School, where he teaches U.S. constitutional law and theory. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:03 am by Jon Hyman
Dukes: Is the FMLA the New Breeding Ground for Class Actions? [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 9:52 am by Bexis
  Now that the Supreme Court narrowed the climate change litigation to state court causes of action (eliminating federal common law), how does, say, Connecticut, get personal jurisdiction over a power company operating in, say, Texas? [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:16 am
The Court recently addressed this same concern in Dukes v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:37 am by Ted Frank
Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 (1971), that employers can be held liable under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act for neutral personnel practices with a disparate impact on minority workers. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:18 am by Web Briefs
” In the Dukes majority opinion, Justice Scalia wrote, “In a company of Wal-Mart’s size and geographical scope, it is quite unbelievable that all managers would exercise their discretion in a common way without some common direction. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:17 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Concepcion: Allows companies to contract around the threat of consumer class actions by upholding an arbitration agreement containing a class action waiver.Honorable Mention: PLIVA Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
  Regardless of the party in power and whether the president has spent his own political capital to push immigration reform (Bush) or not (Obama), nothing has been done. [read post]