Search for: "English v. English" Results 401 - 420 of 11,155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2017, 10:51 am by Christine Corcos
In Somerset v Stewart, 1772, English courts finally held that slavery was not recognised by English law, which led to the termination of slavery in England once and for all; and it was the influence of French courts’ decisions on the bestowal of freedom to foreign slaves that led to the reasoning of the English Court. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:13 am by Christine Corcos
In Somerset v Stewart, 1772, English courts finally held that slavery was not recognised by English law, which led to the termination of slavery in England once and for all; and it was the influence of French courts’ decisions on the bestowal of freedom to foreign slaves that led to the reasoning of the English Court. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Independent of that, it could discern no irregularity, particularly given the fact that DR’s attorney had assured that court that no interpreter was needed -- because DR “could read English and that [DR] had discussed the case with counsel in English and reviewed the plea conditions in English,” and the record demonstrated that DR had a command of the English language.Given that “waiver,” the AT2 thought that DR’s plea was… [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:13 am
In Somerset v Stewart, 1772, English courts finally held that slavery was not recognised by English law, which led to the termination of slavery in England once and for all; and it was the influence of French courts’ decisions on the bestowal of freedom to foreign slaves that led to the reasoning of the English Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:51 am
In Somerset v Stewart, 1772, English courts finally held that slavery was not recognised by English law, which led to the termination of slavery in England once and for all; and it was the influence of French courts’ decisions on the bestowal of freedom to foreign slaves that led to the reasoning of the English Court. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 3:12 am
In Wasa v Lexington [2008] EWCA Civ 150, Lexington appealed against the decision of the English Commercial Court that it was not entitled to recover from its reinsurers in full its settlement with its insured, Alcoa. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 6:58 am
A recent ruling from the English Commercial Court illuminates one risk with the use of the Bermuda form arbitration clause:  if the losing party is dissatisfied with the arbitration result, it may not be permitted to challenge the result under New York law in a New York court, but may instead be limited to challenging the arbitration award under English law in English court.In the case, C v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 7:16 am by Alexander Sandiforth
The recent decision of the English Commercial court, Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 5:29 am
At last, the official English version! [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
The judge considered the factors on secondary indications set out by Laddie J in Haberman v Jackel [1999] F.S.R. 683 (and approved by Jacob LJ in Schlumberger v Electromagnetic Geoservices [2010] EWC Civ 819). [read post]
8 May 2011, 5:18 pm by Eugene R. Fidell
The Supreme Court of Israel sitting as the High Court of Justice has made available in English translation its important 2009 decision in Abu Rahme v. [read post]