Search for: "Ex parte B. J. S."
Results 401 - 420
of 803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2012, 6:36 pm
Pero sigamos: el artículo 6º del engendro (DL Nº 1057) contiene 12 acápites y un párrafo final, NO existe ningún derecho nuevo en primer lugar; el inciso (acápite) “j” consigna una novedad: los servidores –facultativamente- (en ninguna parte se señala que es obligatorio como debiera ser) pueden afiliarse al Sistema Público o Privado de Pensiones, espero que el Reglamento precise esta parte,… [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
I am pleased to be part of the 2023 conference on SEC Regulation Outside the United States to deliver the Fifth Annual Scott Friestad Memorial Lecture. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 3:21 pm
The argument is that something like it was intended in the statute, via the incorporation of the intial judgment of Hodgson J in R v Hillingdon London Borough Council, ex parte Puhlhofer [1986] AC 484 into the terms of the Housing and Planning Act 1986 and thence the Housing Act 1996. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:20 am
Contributing to the realization of a ‘fair marketplace’ (recital 3) is one of the key objectives of the Directive: recital 55 is rooted within an idea of fairness in the part in which it stresses the need to acknowledge ‘[t]he organisational and financial contribution of publishers in producing press publications’. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
To remove a case on a “color of office” argument, the removing party bears the burden of establishing what’s called the three-part “Mesa test,” from the Supreme Court case by that name,[5] The three-part test requires the defendant to show they: were an “officer, or any person acting under that officer, of the United States” are facing criminal charges “for or relating to any act under color of such office”; and have… [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
Plaintiff A from state X was involved in a car crash with defendant B from state Y. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:07 pm
The court thus left the discovery into Frank’s ex parte lobbying activities for a case in which Frank was actually a retained expert witness, which surely will be soon. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:13 am
State ex. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
In fact, because paragraphs (1)(a) and (1)(c) plainly cover obscenity and threats, respectively, much of the speech that can be restricted due to content under the First Amendment is plainly excluded from Section 9.61.260(1)(b)’s reach, meaning that most of the speech that falls within Section 9.61.260(1)(b) is protected speech. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The Administration for Children=s Services (ACS) filed a petition alleging that Lynette J. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The claims which formed the subject matter of the appellant’s only request consisted essentially of claims 5 to 13 as filed on entry into the European phase. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:12 am
The Federalist No. 81, p. 511 (B. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:47 am
ex rel. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:12 pm
I posit that the answer depends considerably on whether the proceedings are ex parte or inter partes. [read post]
9 May 2010, 8:52 am
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this order.Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
Larose and Michael B. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
Meanwhile, there are 46 civil claims being pursued against News International, as revealed in last week’s ’round two’ Case Management Conference before Vos J. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:28 am
E por parte de outras pessoas? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Regulation 8(2)(b) of the 1996 Review Procedures Regulations was made pursuant to section 203(2)(b) of the Act, and this view was supported by the Code of Guidance and the heading to the relevant section being 'Oral Hearings'. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Regulation 8(2)(b) of the 1996 Review Procedures Regulations was made pursuant to section 203(2)(b) of the Act, and this view was supported by the Code of Guidance and the heading to the relevant section being 'Oral Hearings'. [read post]
