Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 401 - 420
of 75,697
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 4:03 pm
In the 1969 case NLRB v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:02 pm
For example, in Italian Colors Rest. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:16 pm
Carlisle v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
Sebelius, given the argument turned largely on novelty? [read post]
17 May 2024, 10:59 am
In the case, Simon v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
, Bradford v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:45 am
The ruling yesterday in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:00 am
CFPB Survives Another Attack Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First and foremost, the Johnson Ministry was dedicated to re-access the Lugano Convention[23] which extended the Brussels regime to certain Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA)/European Economic Area (EEA) in its own right.[24] Given the strong resentments Brexiteers showed against the CJEU during their campaign this move is not without a certain irony, as its case law is also crucial to the uniform interpretation of the Lugano Convention.[25] Whereas Switzerland,… [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:56 am
” “Although the motion court correctly dismissed the Judiciary Law § 487 claim, the proper basis for dismissal is that the claim was insufficiently pleaded given that it is supported by conclusory allegations of intentional deceptive conduct, rather than being duplicative of the legal malpractice (see Sabalza v Salgado, 85 AD3d 436, 438 [1st Dept 2011]).In any event, the court also properly dismissed plaintiff’s Judiciary Law § 487 claim as it is… [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:21 am
Section 21 court case appeal A case going forward to appeal, D’Aubigny v Khan could impact how a landlord communicates with their tenant going forward as this case hinges on whether crucial documentation issued at the start of tenancy is deemed as acceptable as being given to the tenants if it has been posted. [read post]
16 May 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONC. v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Second, if the answer to the first question is affirmative, could the court disregard its duty to inform the passenger of the consequences of the unfairness, given that in the case at hand there was no ‘consumer’ litigating? [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding mechanism in its 7-2 decision in CFPB v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:55 pm
Today, the Supreme Court justices ruled unanimously in Smith v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Case 1: Baldessari Trust v. [read post]
