Search for: "Grant v. Arkansas Supreme Court" Results 401 - 420 of 627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
The United States Supreme Court articulated the standard for a future injury qualifying as an injury in fact in Clapper v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Refusals to deal are generally not protected by the First Amendment In Rumsfeld, the Supreme Court rejected the argument that a law school had a First Amendment right to refuse to allow military recruiters on its property—which is to say, the Court rejected the argument that law schools could engage in a limited boycott of such recruiters. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
When government lawyers dug in to the cases, they had a distinctly different impression than upon first view, and in both cases told the court to grant the petition, vacate the judgment below and remand. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
In reaching its decision, the Fifth Circuit also analyzed and reject the four plaintiffs' argument that the Supreme Court's decision in Barrentine v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am by Amy Howe
  At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck discusses the grant in Armstong v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm by Omar Khodor
Supreme Court ruled that the director of the Patent Office must be able to review decisions issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:08 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the District of Arkansas 2010). [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
He has also cited and relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
  We lambasted Reckis hereand then discussed the defense cert. petition to the Supreme Court here.Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:46 pm by cdw
From the Supreme Court, in Balentine v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
Arkansas, 11-7979, seems a likely hold for Miller v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Arkansas has perhaps the most restrictive doctrine on the classic “arising out of and in the course of the employment” issue. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
A decision by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit late last month concerning Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), in Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 6:45 am by William K. Berenson
In 2013 the Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) legislatively overturned the Supreme Court’s decisions in Ahlborn and Wos v. [read post]