Search for: "Green, et al v. Post, et al" Results 401 - 415 of 415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
  This Newsletter also appears as a post on this website every Monday. [read post]
A blog post on Tex Parte - the Texas Lawyer Blog - summed it up succinctly: We don't need no stinkin' recusal. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Green issued his decision June 16, 2005. *** M. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
Cullen issued his decision Feb. 20, 2003. *** BE&K Construction Co. (32-CA-9479, et al.; 351 NLRB No. 29) Pittsburg, CA Sept. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
Post IARC From a sociology of science perspective, the aftermath of the 1997 IARC monograph is a fascinating natural experiment to view the creation of a sudden, thinly supported, new orthodoxy. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
Google: Judge Appoints a Damages Expert  In the Oracle v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
Green issued his decision Sept. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
  In finding its application of Kravis proper, the Board found that the Respondent could not have relied on the due process standard overruled by Kravis as well settled when it withdrew recognition of the union, because the Supreme Court's earlier decision in NLRB v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]