Search for: "Green v. State of Texas"
Results 401 - 420
of 918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2014, 6:59 am
It has been growing ever stronger since the first Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams were born in the 1960s in response to that decade's turbulent mix of riots, disturbances, and senseless violence like Charles Whitman's infamous clock-tower rampage in Austin, Texas. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 10:53 am
Case citation: Demetriades v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
It was the Catholic bishop of San Antonio, Texas, who brought the early RFRA lawsuit to overcome the historic preservation laws of Boerne, Texas, that eventually rendered it unconstitutional in Boerne v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Not so with today’s case, Truitt v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Green, D. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
The Harris Court cited, with approval, a 2002 traumatic cancer case, State ex rel. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
<> Venancio Aguasanta Arias v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:54 am
People v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:12 am
In State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
" EDF Release: Supreme Court Win for Cross-State Air Pollution Rule<> Shell Oil Company v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
– Fisher v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Texas 1991); Harrison v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
Green, 921 S.W.2d 203, 207-08 (Tex. 1996) (malicious prosecution case). [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:42 am
(See also this article by Preston Green and Peter Moran on state constitutional provisions that may bar vouchers.) [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:14 pm
Texas, there were still 13 states which had sodomy statutes. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
Green v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:05 pm
Ravitch (Michigan State University College of Law), Zoë Robinson (DePaul University College of Law), Lawrence Sager (University of Texas at... [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 7:06 am
In D’Andrea v Epstein, Becker, Green, Wickliff & Hall, PC, a Texas Court of Appeals found that preparation of the memo implicated the law firm’s fiduciary duty to the client and also determined that fact issues remained as to whether a reasonably prudent attorney would have foreseen that the memo would likely harm the client and whether it was foreseeable that the discharged employee would have used the memo against the client. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
In State v. [read post]
