Search for: "Handy v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
Once again the state-law parallel is elusive. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:35 am
” (See the recent Noteworthy Panel Decision (NPD) of Fraire v. [read post]
25 Apr 2025, 1:06 pm
SEAT v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:34 am
Similarly in, Quinlan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 6:07 am
I have one handy for all my clients. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:31 am
Supreme Court ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:31 pm
Other outspoken opponents of trade agreements such as Phil Hare, Zack Space, and Joe Sestak lost.Murphy provides a handy tally of the protectionist losers here. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 2:50 pm
“2019 was a big deal for Accessibility, after the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s dismissal of Robles v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 3:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Walling v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
Whether the Courts will agree may be another matter, which may get addressed in judicial review of this decision and perhaps much sooner in the AC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 10:50 am
The court also discusses the United State Supreme Court’s holding in J.D.B. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
Hassel v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:58 pm
[See Reid v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
I don’t do much Federal work, but some cases are very handy to have in state criminal prosecutions as well. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:23 am
In that context, the Cour d'appel asks the Court of Justice whether EU law permits Member States to authorise a national court to order an internet service provider to install, on a general basis, as a preventive measure, exclusively at its expense and for an unlimited period, a system for filtering all electronic communications in order to identify illegal file downloads. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
Reassuringly it affirms that Creative Commons is not an anti-copyright device but a provider of handy guidance to would-be users, and it doesn't threaten readers with Moorhouse v University of New South Wales, choosing to explain the legal position instead. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm
Well, that's handy! [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:04 am
As a result of the elasticity of this standard, despite being on the books for a decade and a half, the issue has arisen in only one case here in Ohio, Ohio State Bar Assn. v. [read post]
