Search for: "Hatch v Hatch"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
Hatch is having none of it. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
Hatch-Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act, which became Public Law 115-264, 132 Stat. 3676. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Hatch-Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act, which became Public Law 115-364, 132 Stat. 3676. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:38 pm
Stern v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Gamble v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
In Miree v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:58 am
Johnson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:16 am
”); Lockwood v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:49 am
& Jannsen, L.P. v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:40 am
Supp. 2d 514 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (“Cipro III”), it did so because the Court’s 2005 decision in Joblove v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:28 pm
., Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 9:05 am
Merck & Co. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:31 pm
Or it can be a needed escape hatch for a trademark infringement defendant. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:46 pm
Merck & Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:35 am
The individual, employed by the New York City Housing Authority, had violated the Authority written policy prohibiting its staff members from running for political office in a partisan election.* Noting that “It is well settled that "[v]iolation of an employer's reasonable policies may constitute disqualifying misconduct," the Appellate Division said that the Authority’s guidelines were established “to assure compliance with the Hatch Act (5 USC… [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 7:48 am
Barr was a Hatch-Waxman matter, with Alcon losing on infringement, but surviving as to validity. [read post]
7 May 2010, 7:02 am
Pyett, and Gross v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:25 pm
Shashank Upadhye, Vice President, Global Intellectual Property for Apotex, and I will be presenting "Ariad v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:06 pm
v=u7vvfGr6--AThe allegations against the President in the RNC letter have nothing to do with the harm that donor access does to our political system and are yet one more example of the obsession with technicality that has led Hatch Act enforcement far from its objective. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court took a case relating to the Hatch-Waxman Act was Merck v. [read post]
