Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 4,260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2022, 9:44 am
  More specifically, the focus is on the risk of complicity in the human rights violations of others (principally states but also other actors (insurgents, agents,  That, in turn, can be understood to involve three distinct areas of human rights risks: (1) conflict zone risks; (2) states that may be directly or indirectly involved in the commission of human rights wrongs or in support of states committing these wrongs; and (3) states, other… [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:44 am by Florian Mueller
By contrast, in the United States the government firstly has to go to court and seek an injunction from an impartial judge. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
How should we think about the disadvantage that holders of idiosyncratic beliefs face under P2? [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm by Holly Brezee
After Beasley’s failed petitions to cancel Howard’s USPT, Beasley filed a suit in the United States District Court of New Jersey under the Lanham Act, alleging an infringement claim against Howard. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
Opposer also introduced empirical evidence that a substantial portion of the United States is aware of the SPOTIFY mark. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
Opposer also introduced empirical evidence that a substantial portion of the United States is aware of the SPOTIFY mark. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States that challenges to impeachment are non-justiciable. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 12:43 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
On October 22, 2019, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued the ’087 patent, entitled “Instrument for Treating an Ocular Disorder. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am by Matthew Hersh (Wolters Kluwer)
Case date: 14 December 2021 Case number: No. 2021-1433 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]