Search for: "Howard v. Place" Results 401 - 420 of 850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman had this blog’s preview; Michelle Korkhov and Anna Marienko at Cornell also preview the case. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Background and Content of SB 1272 (Which Attempted to Place Proposition 49 on the Ballot) In July, both houses of the California legislature enacted a bill (SB 1272) that proposed to place an “advisory” question before the California voters in this November’s election. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm by MOTP
DEBORAH PATTERSON HOWARD GOUGHNOUR, Appellant,v.ROBERT H. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 10:14 am by Ria Tabacco Mar
While still a law student at Howard University, Murray argued that separate was inherently unequal, work that formed the basis for the landmark victory in Brown v. [read post]
27 May 2018, 10:39 am by Sandy Levinson
 And why does Joseph Story, the author of the shameful decision in Prigg v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 8:27 am by John Jascob
Jason Howard, J.D.On appeal from the Court of Chancery, the Delaware Supreme Court has affirmed the decision that Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:04 pm
What a horrible place to practice law. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:04 am by Adam Chandler
(Thanks to Howard Bashman of How Appealing for the link.) [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 8:01 pm by Keith Orenstein
What may be surprising, though, is the fact that fault is almost completely irrelevant to the financial issues involved in a divorce, such as spousal maintenance, child support, and equitable distribution of marital property.Exhibit A is the recent decision of the First Department in Howard S. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm by nflatow
To prepare for the landmark school segregation case, Brown v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 7:59 am by James Romoser
And the court deadlocked in the Pennsylvania election case, with Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the three liberal justices in an order that leaves in place a Pennsylvania lower-court decision requiring mail-in ballots to be counted if they are received up to three days after Election Day. [read post]