Search for: "Hughes v. Hughes" Results 401 - 420 of 2,707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 A reserved judgment is awaited in the fourth, Sobrinho v Impressa Publishing, heard on 7 to 9 December 2015 by Dingemans J. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 8:50 am
The Appellate Division, Third Department affirmed the lower court's granting of summary judgment to the defendants in Hughes Village Restaurant, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 8:50 am
The Appellate Division, Third Department affirmed the lower court's granting of summary judgment to the defendants in Hughes Village Restaurant, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
In the case of ML and WW v Germany ([2018] ECHR 554) (available only French), the Fifth Section of the Court of Human Rights dismissed an Article 8 “right to be forgotten” application in respect of the historic publication by the media of information concerning a murder conviction. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 4:28 pm by Howard Bashman
” And at Law & Crime, Elura Nanos has a post titled “Circuit Judge Who Was on Trump’s SCOTUS Shortlist Reluctantly Blocks Tennessee Abortion Law, But Urges High Court to Overturn ‘Wrong’ Roe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:44 pm by Jeffrey Brown
A federal district court held that cell site location data obtained without a search warrant to be unconstitutional, bringing the number of such holdings to more than a dozen, according to the Wall Street Journal.In a one page opinion, Judge Lynn Hughes (S.D. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:42 am by Martin George
Internet Defamation and Choice of Law in Dow Jones v Gutnick Yet another article originally published in the 2003 issue of... [read post]
8 May 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
In Rudd v Bridle [2019] EWHC 893 (QB), Warby J tried a number of issues arising out of a data subject access request (“DSAR”) under s.7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (“the DPA 1998”). [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 3:50 am by Jocelyn Bosse
The recent decision of the Munich Local Division in SES v Hanshow seemed to go in an odd direction by using the application as filed and prosecution history in the claim interpretation.Rose Hughes also speculated on the potential referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal to consider how much the description should be taken into account for claim interpretation, given the confusing and contradictory case law on this important question. [read post]