Search for: "IN RE E W" Results 401 - 420 of 3,922
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2015, 5:58 am by Staci Zaretsky
* "[W]e refuse to be distracted by disgruntled employees or frivolous lawsuits. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Reviewed by Martin SchermaierLe marché du mérite, Penser le droit et l’économie avec Léonard Lessius, written by W. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 6:17 am
"[W]e need to defeat not just Trump, but whatever it is he springs from; the dying dinosaurs that exist in this country who miss the old way where the white man was going to run the show. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 3:57 am
In re MacDonald Plummer, Serial No. 88155158 (June 18, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:33 am
Goldwyn, president of Goldwyn Global Strategies, stated that “(w)ere freer now to speak out on behalf of democracy and freedom because we’re not dependent on oil imports from countries where those practices are suppressed. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:05 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
If a specification does not assign or suggest a particular definition to a claim term, and the PTAB relies upon evidence extrinsic to the specification to construe a claim, “[w]e review [the] underlying factual determinations concerning extrinsic evidence for substantial evidence and the ultimate construction of the claim de novo. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
If you’re in a search process, you’re in trouble. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 12:55 pm
....judge really helping w/jurors... still having difficulties with #30...any ideas??? [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 12:05 pm by Tom Lamb
According the the February 2, 2018 Transfer Order issued by the JPML: [W]e find that these actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization under Section 1407 in the Eastern District of Kentucky will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
White (June 15, 2022, G059883) (Tedesco 1), we made clear to these lawyers that “[w]e do not confuse aggressive argument with persuasive advocacy. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 2:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
However, we have repeatedly stated that "[w]e may not reweigh evidence on appeal. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:16 am
"[W]e read the application as referring to software used via the Internet to provide business consultation services that include the specific types of actions listed above. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 9:13 am
" Rid's third point is:  "[W]e must resist the temptation to jump to premature conclusions on 'a Russian plant' without good evidence — 'classic earmarks' are not nearly enough. [read post]