Search for: "In Re: Cross H."
Results 401 - 420
of 918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2016, 6:06 am
Klingsberg, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Monday, April 18, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Antitrust, Arbitration, Break fees, China, Contracts, Cross-border transactions, Deal protection, International governance, Jurisdiction, Leveraged acquisitions, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions,Private Equity, Special purpose vehicles The Sovereign-Bank Diabolic Loop and ESBies Posted by Markus Brunnermeier, Princeton University & and Marco Pagano, University… [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
Schnabel, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisitions, Cross-border transactions, Foreign firms, Internal Revenue Code, Inversions, IRS, Mergers & acquisitions, Securities Regulation, Spinoffs, Target firms, Tax avoidance, Taxation, Treasury Department Statement from Commissioner Piwowar on Regulation S-K Posted by Michael S. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
Touset, supra.The opinion goes on to explain that,[b]ased upon this knowledge, Homeland Security Investigations (`HIS’) placed a look-out on Defendant so that, if he re-entered the United States from abroad, his luggage and electronic media would be searched at the border. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
They’re underpaid. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 5:40 pm
H is for Higher Standard Deduction. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:17 am
Mexican citizens or Mexican-Americans in border areas might cross into the US and buy Belmora Flanax here before returning to Mexico, or might forego purchasing BCC’s Flanax when they visited Mexico because they’d bought the US Flanax instead. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Criteria for efficient operation: we can comprehend our duties (H. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:38 am
In assessing how best to respond, they will often be well advised to draw on not only expertise and cross-functional consultation within the enterprise, but also to consult externally with credible, independent experts, including from Governments, civil society, national human rights institutions and relevant multi-stakeholder initiatives. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
”) 505(h) to make a determination regarding the use, relevance, or admissibility of this classified information. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm
The motion of defendant the City of New York (hereinafter the "City") for summary judgment and dismissal of the complaint and cross claims against it is denied. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:55 am
Batty at *10, citing In Re Zoloft, 26 F. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 1:16 am
(Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images) Of course, it’s still early but fingers crossed that the good news continues. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Civ. 1ère, No. 13-23566.March was all about the 'Blurred Lines' in copyright and a US Jury's decision to award $7.3 million to the Estate of Marvin Gaye on the basis that Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke’s soul-inspired pop song "Blurred Lines" too closely mirrored Gaye’s 1977 single "Got to Give It Up". [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:53 pm
Following Turkey’s decision to shoot down a Russian warplane after it crossed into Turkish airspace last month, Russia has called on Turkey to provide compensation for the downed jet. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:27 pm
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in Re H (A Child) [2015] EWCA Civ 1284, which you will have seen in its previous incarnations here : when the original first instance decision on care and placement orders was successfully appealed : Re H (Children) [2015] EWCA Civ 583 and when Russell J subsequently dealt with the rehearing and combined adoption application in July (the second first instance decision) here : Re W… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm
H. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 6:12 am
[H]e amassed one of the greatest fortunes in the world — and is likely never to pay any taxes on it....Maybe Mr. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:21 pm
On the facts of this case, W did not need to cross-examine H, since the documents he disclosed revealed that he had deceived the court; 8. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
The court also publicly reprimanded the lawyer for crossing the line: “It is disrespectful and unbecoming of a lawyer to resort to such language, particularly when directed toward a judicial officer. [read post]
