Search for: "In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena"
Results 401 - 420
of 609
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2012, 8:47 pm
In In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 274 F.3d 563 (1st Cir. 2001), the intervenors claimed that they themselves had an attorney-client privilege to assert. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Case no. 11-12268 (11th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:27 pm
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, 2012 U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm
The case is In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, No. 11-12268 & 11-15421 (11th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
On the other hand, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit sitting in Atlanta held yesterday in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated March 25, 2011 that forcing a suspect to decrypt a computer or produce a decrypted version of the files on the computer is testimonial, and therefore does trigger Fifth Amendment protection. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:27 pm
The 11th Circuit just decided In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum March 25, 2011, USA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:04 pm
[FN3] The government issued a grand jury subpoena to John Doe to come and open the encrypted files. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
(Orin Kerr) The important decision is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:29 pm
., for instance, asked Verrilli if the government could criminalize lying about whether one received a high school diploma.In other news, the 11th Circuit came out with a fascinating opinion today (In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011 USA v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am
The requested records date to January 2007, and those subpoenaed have been instructed to bring them to a federal grand jury convening Feb. 29 in Reno. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:15 pm
Id. at 1414, citing In re Grand Jury Investigation, 399 F.3d 527 (2d Cir. 2005); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F3d 910 (8th Cir. 1997); In re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263, (D.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
” The judge said Schuelke’s probe “differed in significant respects” from a grand jury investigation. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:55 am
But early in the morning, representatives of the district attorney’s office served her a subpoena and ordered her to appear before the grand jury at 10 a.m. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:58 pm
Back to the grand jury courtroom. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm
” In Boucher, the grand jury first subpoenaed a piece of paper containing the password (which presumably didn’t exist), and then changed its mind and asked that Boucher be ordered to “produce the contents of his encrypted hard drive in an unencrypted format by decrypting the drive before the grand jury. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:38 am
In In re Grand Jury Subpoena to Boucher, 2007 WL 4246473 (D. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 12:48 pm
Therefore, typical federal investigations — especially white collar and complex ones — can take years, and can involve slowly flipping one witness against the next, bringing witness after witness before the grand jury to lock them in, sending subpoena after subpoena to third parties, until the prosecutors build their case. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:36 am
They probably spent the time between November 18 and Jan. 5 doing the paperwork to get approval from the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section to indict on the RICO Counts and taking the case to the grand jury. [read post]
