Search for: "In Re Clement"
Results 401 - 420
of 633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2011, 2:30 pm
[Am Law Daily]* Paul Clement v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:47 pm
We should re-examine the licenses associated with the data to ensure that Canadians are free to use the information in whatever manner they see fit. [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:03 am
When I was growing up, it meant seeing Willie Mays, Hank Aaron and Roberto Clemente in the same outfield. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:15 am
They’re on the same scale they’ve been on for the last couple years, which is roughly the 2010 Cravath bonus scale, without spring bonuses. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:05 am
Clement v Brumfield, 2004 Cal. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:17 am
Prizes It's not every day that you're randomly picked from among 87,000 peers. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:48 am
Clemens, supra (quoting In re United States, 441 F.3d 44 (1st Cir. 2006)). [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:11 am
” In re Clement, 131 F.3d 1464, 1468 (Fed. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:10 am
” On appeal, the CAFC considered whether or not the “materially narrowed in other respects” aspect of the rule established in In re Clement, (MPEP 1412.02), must be related to the “critical limitation” (i.e., circular attachment pad) or whether the narrowing must relate to an “overlooked aspect,” such as an unclaimed species or embodiment as advanced by the USPTO. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:22 pm
" In re Clement, 131 F.3d 1464, 1468 (Fed. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:19 pm
For the second day in a row this is a little bit later than normal, but as a result of that and wanting to provide ample coverage to two big legal developments, we're expanding today's roundup to 16 posts. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:45 am
If you’re starting an appellate practice in 2008, for example, the easiest way to do that was with departing Bushies who were looking to re-enter private practice. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:28 am
It didn’t show we’re smart about using it. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:40 pm
Well, we’re now a full day removed from L’Affaire King & Spalding, and the reviews on the firm’s decision to drop its representation of House members have been decidedly mixed. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm
AG Holder: Criticism of Paul Clement ‘Very Misplaced’ :: Why DOMA Deserves A Lawyer :: Gay Rights Group: You’re Damn Right We Pressured Law Firm on DOMA [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:22 pm
They’re going to have their hands full. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:24 am
I haven't seen all of the stories on today's news re: King & Spaulding, former SG Paul Clement, and the DOMA litigation, but I wonder if we might be missing part of why this case became increasingly unpopular within K&S... [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:32 am
We’ll see how its new slogan (“We’ll represent you, but only if you’re popular”) will go over. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:51 am
Start talking about exchanging Twitter accounts to a potential older client and they are going to look at you like you’re a jackass. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:03 pm
They're right. [read post]
