Search for: "In re: Certification of Need for Additional Judges"
Results 401 - 420
of 679
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
In addition, we are continuously “working up” cases by requesting and compiling all the documents needed to prove each veteran’s claim. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
Experience—a quick look at the U.K. rules on certification The U.K. standard appears similar to U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
The court in Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner [2014] IEHC 310 (18 June 2014), questioned whether the Directive and the EU Commissioner’s Decision needed to be re-evaluated in the light of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and whether the Commissioner could look beyond or otherwise disregard the Community finding. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:37 am
Fundamentally, Judge Weinstein disagreed with the Supreme Court’s treatment of the interaction between state law and Rule 23, because he believed that it would reward forum shopping, and used that disagreement to weigh against certification. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 7:42 pm
While the fee is higher than need be because the petition was re-filed in Family Court, there do not appear to be any questionable entries. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
In addition to updating your pay practices, be sure to revise any affected policies and statements in your employee handbook, operational manual, timekeeping procedures, job advertisements and recruiting materials. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:07 am
”Note the opinion by Judge Bryson in 678 F.3d 1314 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The Court concluded: “There is no need for a remand. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
Judge Pillard wrote the opinion; it was joined by Judges Rogers and Wilkins. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
Perhaps Judge Garza, who dissented in both cases, needs to prepare a dramatic TV spot explaining why review is warranted. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:46 am
” But absent members need not. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
In support of their motion for class certification, and to prove their c [read post]
30 May 2015, 2:30 am
To find out more about how the Firm can help with your appellate needs, please call (410) 385-2225 and ask to speak with Judge Murphy, Ms. [read post]
30 May 2015, 2:30 am
To find out more about how the Firm can help with your appellate needs, please call (410) 385-2225 and ask to speak with Judge Murphy, Ms. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
RT if you agree that this is the kind of leadership America needs. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:01 pm
Although it is often overwhelming when you’re greeted with divorce papers at your doorstep, you don’t need to panic. [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:16 am
This is in addition to the basic way we deal with problems of this sort, which is copyright law. [read post]
8 May 2015, 6:11 am
In addition, establishing timelines by which the Board will certify a tariff would assist in reducing industry-wide uncertainty associated with delays in certification. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
(And while you’re at it, see if they know what the hell a “bolo” is.) [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
Alabama, 14-8194, both one-time relists, asked whether a judge’s override of a jury’s decision to recommend a sentence of life imprisonment without parole violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on arbitrary and capricious sentences and cruel and unusual punishment, or the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee to a trial by jury in criminal cases. [read post]
