Search for: "In re Application of Jones"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2017, 12:24 pm
Realistically, the practical application of the law varies from judge to judge and court to court. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Lynch, 803 F.3d 1165 (10th Cir. 2015) (wrote opinion) Decision of Board of Immigration Appeals inIn re Briones did not apply retroactively to bar alien’s application for adjustment of status. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:14 pm
” In re Int’l Admin. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:11 pm
Rosenfeld, 34 N.J. 128 (1961), Jones v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm
Rosenfeld, 34 N.J. 128 (1961), Jones v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:33 am
So, Lucasfilm’s filing of a trademark application for FORCES OF DESTINY is not dispositive. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 12:46 pm
“Because of the circumstances, it’s hard not to conclude they’re related … it might have some effect in terms of action plaintiff lawyers might take. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 12:46 pm
“Because of the circumstances, it’s hard not to conclude they’re related … it might have some effect in terms of action plaintiff lawyers might take. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:10 pm
appeared first on Goldberg Jones | Divorce For Men. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:10 pm
appeared first on Goldberg Jones | Divorce For Men. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
And if none of those doctrines is applicable? [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:25 pm
KENNETH KUBLER, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Consumer law -- Mortgage foreclosure -- Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act -- Loss mitigation -- Loan servicer had no duty to evaluate an application for loss mitigation options submitted by borrowers when, at time application was submitted, a foreclosure sale of borrowers' property was scheduled to occur in two days -- Under Regulation X, which implements RESPA, a loan servicer's duty to evaluate a borrower's loss… [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
To have probable cause, `it is not necessary that the officer know that the discovered res is contraband or evidence of a crime, but only that there be “a “practical, nontechnical” probability that incriminating evidence is involved. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 5:12 am
“For some, the president believes that the applicant’s successful re-entry will be aided with additional drug treatment, and the president has conditioned those commutations on an applicant’s seeking that treatment,” [White House counsel Neil] Eggleston wrote. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that the exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
Dreadlocked applicants need not apply. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
Dreadlocked applicants need not apply. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:28 am
Carvin and his associates at Jones Day took nine days. [read post]
