Search for: "In re Dominic F."
Results 401 - 420
of 653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2014, 5:30 pm
”In re Gleave, 560 F.3d 1331, 1337-38 (Fed. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 10:04 pm
Hollis Salzman and Meegan F. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:59 am
"Why," his friend replies, "has our city gotten that f**king bad? [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:58 pm
Pahlavi, 58 F.3d 1406, 1411-12 (9th Cir.1995); Choi v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 3:06 am
In re Tigerland-Foxland Ltd., Serial No. 85130889 (July 23, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
American, 944 F. 2d at 259. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 pm
(Pix from Business and Human Rights Resource Center, Binding treaty: Pros and cons (June 2014))As the Business and Human Rights Resource Center explained:At the 26th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, two resolutions were tabled for adoption by the Council. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:56 am
In re Confluence Holdings Corp., Serial No. 85643399 (June 19, 2014) [not precedential].The Marks: The Board not surprisingly found the word BOMBER to be the dominant element of applicant's mark, since GEAR is disclaimed and BOMBER appears as the first word in the mark. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:23 am
My kids are huge soccer fans (you may know this if you’re a regular reader) and they’ve been counting down to the first game (Brazil beat Croatia) for months. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:45 am
., 308 F.3d 907, 910-11 (8th Cir. 2002)). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 11:56 am
” And a Weberian approach, of course, has dominated most social-scientific thinking about the state since the 1970s and 80s. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:26 pm
The Board conducted the likelihood of confusion analysis according to the thirteen factors set forth in the case In re E.I. du Pont Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361 (C.C.P.A. 1973). [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am
Gerardi: Muerte en el vecindario de Dios Julie López F&G Editores (Guatemala City 2012) The Art of Political Murder: Who Killed the Bishop? [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:20 am
And while we’re probably not quite there yet – at what point do the bullied become the bullies? [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:45 am
In re Vistaprint Ltd., 628 F.3d 1342, 1347 (Fed. [read post]
1 May 2014, 12:20 pm
[I]f you were writing a statute, . . . what policy concerns would support a conclusion that there was no infringement on the facts here? [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:18 pm
See In re E. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm
., and Carlos F. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:54 am
& Assn’s, §11-703(f)(3). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:41 pm
All you’re talking about is – if I can use the word – an “idea. [read post]
