Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 9" Results 401 - 420 of 862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2016, 9:07 am by Liisa Speaker
Additionally, we also note that that the problem is compoundedby the fact that respondents were apparently not appointed counsel when the initial denial ofparenting time occurred. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am by Dennis Crouch
  In re TC Heartland, LLC, No. 2016-105, at 10 (Fed. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:09 am by Jordan Furlong
The governing Benchers of the law society will vote on the committee’s recommendation on Nov. 9. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 11:19 am by Ingrid Wuerth
The court must grant 180-day extension(s) upon re-certification by the State Department (again on petition of the DOJ), which leaves open the possibility of very long-term stays (the italics are mine). [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:30 am by Kate Fort
In the initial petition filed on November 18, 2013, the State of Oklahoma1 (the State) declared ICWA’s provisions applicable. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:09 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
On August 18th, Nosal filed a petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Question #9 – Family Based Immigration As a Lawful Permanent Resident, can I file an I-130 petition for my family members? [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 5:59 am by Jim Sedor
The fees are $40 for initial registration and $25 for amendments and annual renewal. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Eric Goldman
For over a decade, I’ve blogged about 1-800 Contacts’ campaign to suppress competitive keyword advertising, including its legislative games (e.g., those times when 1-800 Contacts asked the Utah legislature to ban competitive keyword advertising) and at least 15 lawsuits against competitors costing millions of dollars of legal fees. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am by Bill Marler
This prompts a Citizen’s Petition and federal judge’s ruling that orders the FDA to ban fluid raw milk and milk products from interstate commerce (21 CFR Section 1240.61). [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
Third, and also for the first time on appeal, M.H. contends that, as applied here, section 647(j)(1) violates his First Amendment rights.In re M.H., supra.In the opinion, the court explains, initially, that  [w]e affirm. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” Hargis’s petition to cancel B&B’s trademark was dismissed in June 2003. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 11:39 am
INS, 791 F.2d 752, 753-54 (9th Cir. 1986), quoting In re Longstaff, 761 F.2d 1439, 1441 (5th Cir. 1983). [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am by Florian Mueller
It also puts Judge Alsup at loggerheads with the U.S. government, which found Google's cert petition flawed and recommended its rejection last year. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
This is so because theazidomethyl group would have been expected to performinefficiently in that role.IBS submitted an initial petition that articulated a setof rationales for why the challenged claims were invalid,including why a person of ordinary skill would be motivatedto combine the prior art references at issue. [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:40 pm by Tom Lamb
The timing from initiation of drug to presentation with kidney involvement appears to be quite variable, occurring anywhere from 1 week to 9 months.... [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 10:08 pm by Jon
They shall conduct business according to rules of procedurethey shall adopt by a vote of two-thirds of each body, which shall include power to select their presidents and other officials.6.1.1 Such legislative power, may not be subdelegated to staff, administrators, magistrates, or courts, but 6.1.2 Executive officials may issue directives or regulations to government employees or contractors under their supervision, which directives or regulations shall be subject to review by the Diet or the… [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
Answer #9 Yes; however, how soon you re-apply depends upon several factors. [read post]