Search for: "In re Judge Russell" Results 401 - 420 of 785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 9:11 am by Steve Hall
“We’re disappointed that the judge feels there’s not enough time to resolve this before June 12,” said Gary Graham, editor of The Spokesman-Review. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 7:11 am by Kalvis Golde
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger defends Florida judge Barbara Lagoa, another prominent candidate for Ginsburg’s seat, against criticism for Lagoa’s decision not to recuse herself “from a case involving Florida’s felon re-enfranchising law” earlier this year. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 1:47 pm
Do you want to be part of a thriving law school in a Russell Group University? [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by David Markus
“They’re not trying to get in our way. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:39 pm by Nate Russell
— Nate Russell is a liaison lawyer with Courthouse Libraries BC. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 10:25 am by Steve Hall
"If they’re not committed to the law, they shouldn’t be a judge, in my opinion. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 5:03 am
People will wait for months to get lawyers appointed, and while they're at it they should make the judges run up and down the hallways of the ninth floor the way we do to get files. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:38 am by Laurie Lin
Jennifer Ain and Russell Lippman3. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Austin 14-271Issue: Whether a reviewing court may presume that a trial judge acted “vindictively” in giving a defendant a higher sentence after resentencing, when no higher court had vacated the trial judge's original sentence. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am by Maureen Johnston
Mack 14-990Issue: Whether a single-judge district court may determine that a complaint covered by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm by John Ehrett
Mack 14-990Issue: Whether a single-judge district court may determine that a complaint covered by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
Notably, the Supreme Court in positing the defense in Russell, denied that it precluded prosecution in [read post]