Search for: "In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: T. L. S."
Results 401 - 420
of 767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
” For its part Cox wanted the jury's decision reversed as "a matter of law". [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:48 am
If jurisdiction is not based on server location, internet companies may be exposed to jurisdiction based on various other factors; for example, governments and courts may find grounds for jurisdiction over companies based on doing business or committing torts in the countries. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 8:26 am
The movement had big support among a wide swath of Egyptians because it had been a significant part of the country’s civil society, doing good works over a long period of time. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 10:30 am
Does It Matter What the West Says? [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
L., UNC Sch. of Gov’t Blog (Apr. 21, 2015). [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
L., UNC Sch. of Gov’t Blog (Apr. 21, 2015). [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm
L. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 8:09 am
Somewhat surprisingly, Ohlin’s edited volume convinced me that it doesn’t matter so much whether human rights treaties apply alongside the laws of war or not. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
Vanessa L. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
If we don’t, we can be sued and ordered by a court to pay damages to those we have harmed. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
Hesse’s bio, but I can’t help noticing that it got cleaned up recently on the justice.gov website. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:21 pm
Venue Equity and Non-Uniformity Elimination Act, S.2733, 114th Cong. (2016). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Int’l, Inc., 159 So. 3d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). $1,383.69 formula fee for 31.1 hours of legal work = $44.50 an hour. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Int’l, Inc., 159 So. 3d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). $1,383.69 formula fee for 31.1 hours of legal work = $44.50 an hour. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
Evan Foley’s case was also subsequently resolved. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm
And because the North Carolina statute “makes it impossible to determine whether the accused has committed a crime without examining the content of his communication,” the court held, it constitutes a content-based speech restriction, despite the state’s aim of protecting minors. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:33 am
Speaking of slavery, the US was a pirate nation for a long time, refusing to grant rights to foreign authors, and during the Civil War the South found time to enact a more protective copyright law, “[t]o distinguish itself from the North, cultivate an aristocratic and nonmercantile national identity, and appeal to the British. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 3:56 am
See L. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
But these stories matter—and not just as some historical curiosity. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
The judge began his analysis motion by explaining that[i]t is the plaintiff's burden to show that subject matter jurisdiction exists. [read post]
