Search for: "Instructional Systems v. Computer"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,093
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
My remarks, entitled Inside the Cage of the System (制度的笼子里): Standards Setting, National Security Values, Tech Platforms, Regulation, and the Central Contradiction of Legality in the Current Historical Era, suggests how the approaches to contemporary efforts to cage tech platforms (includingh generative AI systems) within standards-based regulation that are simultaneously national security aligned and embedded within the domains of… [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:59 am
Patent 6,125,447: "Protection domains to provide security in a computer system" U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 10:58 am
(See Turner v. [read post]
29 Jul 2006, 4:36 am
" Many state statutes do, and they usually say something like this: "`Access' means to approach, instruct, communicate with, store data in, retrieve data from, or otherwise make use of any resources of a computer, computer system, or computer network. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:51 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 12:32 pm
Patent No. 6,216,158, System and Method Using a Palm Sized Computer to Control Network Devices (the ‘158 patent). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:31 pm
The Ninth Circuit ruled on Williams v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:20 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
Code § 1030 et seq., and the Virginia Computer Crimes Act, Va. [read post]
8 May 2011, 5:22 am
Kuebel v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:39 am
Merck v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 6:51 am
The court also noted that independent claim 23 - directed to a "computer architecture" with various interconnected servers should be treated as a system rather than a method. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
He instructed Reisig to take an inventory of everything, box it up and bring it to his office then he would handle the matter from that point. . . . [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:44 am
Such a claim for computer instructions is not considered by this office to be statutory under 35 U.S.C. 101. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:53 am
In a communication accompanying the summons to oral proceedings, the Board set out its preliminary opinion that the invention did not involve an inventive step (Article 56 EPC).V. [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:32 am
V. [read post]
AI and inventorship guidance: Incentivizing human ingenuity and investment in AI-assisted inventions
12 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
From an examiner’s perspective, it will not matter if AI, or other advanced computer system, performed actions that would rise to the level of inventorship. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 5:01 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:23 am
Thomson controlled access by bidders to its system and instructed bidders about how to use the system. [read post]
