Search for: "J L S Holdings LLC"
Results 401 - 420
of 642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm
President Donald J. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 6:09 am
Noreuil and Michael J. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
A court in the Northern District of California in Google LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:38 am
J. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
(Class 46) Switzerland Butter: not that unique (Class 46) United Kingdom Latest report on British IP crime 2009/10 (IPKat) Breaking news: Vodkat appeal dismissed: Diageo v Intercontinental Brands (IPKat) The cost of a Hendrix covermount: Experience Hendrix Llc & Anor v Times Newspapers Ltd (1709 Blog) EWCA allows appeal of Patent Court’s decision to revoke patents: Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS (PatLit) (IPKat) (EPLAW) IP attorney… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC, 2013 WL 5532767, at *7-8 (D. [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:41 pm
" David J. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:53 am
Jay L. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 11:41 am
Freeport, like Masterworks, do not tokenize the objects themselves; Rather, they set up series LLC who acquires an artwork, via affiliated Freeport Curation LLC, which then becomes the series LLC’s primary asset and subject to investment under Tier 2 Regulation A of the Securities Act.[16] The tokens registered on the blockchain are just a corresponding visual representation of the ownership interest to a particular series, not conferring any rights that the… [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Because it would be difficult for us to add anything of substance to the district court's comprehensive and well-reasoned opinion, we AFFIRM for the reasons stated by Judge David L. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
An expert who ignored studies was excluded by the district court, but the Court of Appeals found an abuse of discretion, holding that the sufficiency of an expert’s basis is a question of weight and not admissibility.[13] These rulings elevate form over substance by halting the gatekeeping inquiry at an irrelevant, high level of abstraction, and finding that the challenged expert witness was doing something “sciencey,” which is good enough for government work. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
When U.com, Inc., 293 F.Supp.2d 734 (E.D.Mich.2003) (holding no likelihood of confusion for pop-up advertisements for non-Wells Fargo vendors displayed in response to “Wells Fargo” keyword); U–Haul Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:52 pm
BARNES, J., concurs. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
CompuCredit Holdings Corp. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in James L. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:54 am
Don't hold your breath. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
"[116] Turner and Rumsfeld rejected similar claims.[117] Even the district court opinion striking down the specific Florida social media access rules in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The court went on to explain that[a]s to the first issue, the court of appeals held that sufficient evidence supported Marsh's conviction for knowing possession of child pornography. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
On the same day, an application was heard in the case of Davidoff v Google LLC KB-2023-000977. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
Grant, Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Adam J. [read post]
