Search for: "J. DOe" Results 401 - 420 of 28,566
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2016, 7:35 am by Docket Navigator
LKQ Corporation, 1-12-cv-02533 (ILND March 18, 2016, Order) (Lefkow, J.) [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 10:30 am by By STEPHEN J. LUBBEN
The Dodd-Frank Act does little to address the special status enjoyed by derivatives contracts in bankruptcy, says Stephen J. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 6:34 am
Over at BigHollywood, film critic John Hanlon lays out the pros and cons of Into the Abyss, and does double-duty with a Townhall.com review of J. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:52 am by Kenan Farrell
Plaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates, PLLC Defendant: John Does 1-33 Cause: Direct Infringement, Contributory Infringement Court: Southern District of Indiana Judge: Judge Sarah Evans Barker Referred To: Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch View this document on Scribd [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Consequently, the legal nature of any decision taken on the legal basis of the Extension Agreements remains within that legal system and does not extend to the legal system of the EPC. [3.3.3] The Extension Agreements make it absolutely clear that references to provisions of the EPC are exhaustive and, thus, that there can be no corresponding application of other provisions, including those of A 106 et seq. concerning the appeals procedure. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:14 am by Marshall Hogan
  It does reveal, however, that the towing company believes that Kurtz libeled it by "falsely and publicly claimed that Plaintiffs have towed vehicles where no violation has occurred and which claims are untrue. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 12:39 pm
It's not a good practice, but it does seem to be a tendency of the ICRC more or less since the landmines campaign.But my thanks to J for a stimulating email, especially since, as he says, he rarely agrees with the views on this blog.From reader J:I just read your blog on Hamdan, and would like to share the following comments, for what they are worth. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The decision does not exceed the margin of discretion conferred to the President of the EPO in application of R 152(1). [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, not to generally excuse all delays does not constitute a breach of any obligation of the EPO under the PCT nor, contrary to the appellant’s argument, does it raise any conflict between the provisions of the EPC and of the PCT in which PCT’s provisions should prevail under A 150(2). [read post]