Search for: "John Doe #1 to John Doe #10" Results 401 - 420 of 5,421
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2018, 4:58 pm by Bruce Zagaris
District Court for the Eastern District of New York.[1]During a bail hearing on December 7, 2018, John Gibb-Carsley, a lawyer with the Canadian federal Justice Department, told the court Ms. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's an excerpt from the facts: John Doe and Jane Roe were students at the University of Michigan. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:06 pm by Eric
HathiTrust, 1:11-cv-06351-HB (SDNY Oct. 10, 2012). [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
 Those restrictions include: (1) limitation on the number of the noisiest aircraft that can operate at the Airport; (2) limitation on the number of passengers that can use the Airport annually; (3) limitation on the number of aircraft loading bridges; and, perhaps most important, (4) limitation on the hours of aircraft operation (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. on Sundays). [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:12 pm by Adam Levitin
An arbitrator granted the request, but there does not appear to be any court order confirming the award. (10) Stormy Daniels brought suit in California state court seeking a declaratory judgment that the contract was void as unconscionable/against public policy and unenforceable because it lacks a signature from David Dennison. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 11:00 am by R0m@n_@dmin
  For this crime, you must serve at least 10 years in prison, or 1/3 to 1/2 the total sentence if that is greater, before you are eligible for parole. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:56 am
District Judge John Bates said in a written opinion that al-Awlaki's father does not have the authority to sue to stop the United States from killing his son. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:51 am by Liisa Speaker
(US Const, art 1, sec. 10, cl 1).Ex Post Facto analysis:The ex post facto clause was one of the first, Constitutional question to be addressed by the Supreme Court in 1798, which held that the ex post facto clause doesn't ban all retroactive lawmaking, only retroactive punishment. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Colonel Victory. 3 short knocks, 1 long. ...-. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Sept. 12, 2006) (Order).........................15Tr. of Test. of John Doe No.1, Taylor v.Crawford, No. 05-4173 (W.D. [read post]