Search for: "John Doe A,B,C and D" Results 401 - 420 of 1,363
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2018, 10:55 am by Colby Pastre
We seek to identify what the state does well and to point out opportunities for improvement. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:06 am by Michael Geist
Scott Fitzgerald and George Orwell along with books by John Wyndham and John Steinbeck that will enter the public domain in Canada by the end of the decade. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Imagine that, as between Candidates A and C, Candidate B’s voters prefer Candidate C by a margin of 16 to 14. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:50 am by Brian M. Krause, Esq.
The End Demand Illinois campaign raises awareness about the role that purchasers (often referred to as “johns”), pimps, and traffickers play in perpetuating violence against women in the sex trade. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm by Samuel Bray
In particular, the historians' brief (a) downplays the evidence in work by Steve Yeazell and Bob Bone that the parties and non-parties who could jointly benefit from a bill of peace were a preexisting cohesive social unit like a group of parishioners (neither Yeazell nor Bone is cited); (b) ignores the conceptual development of the bill of peace for municipal taxpayers out of that theory of a preexisting cohesive social unit; (c) relies on late nineteenth-century extensions of… [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm by Samuel Bray
In particular, the historians' brief (a) downplays the evidence in work by Steve Yeazell and Bob Bone that the parties and non-parties who could jointly benefit from a bill of peace were a preexisting cohesive social unit like a group of parishioners (neither Yeazell nor Bone is cited); (b) ignores the conceptual development of the bill of peace for municipal taxpayers out of that theory of a preexisting cohesive social unit; (c) relies on late nineteenth-century extensions of… [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Here, the question becomes whether, given that purchasers are fully aware of what they are getting, the Lanham Act's likelihood of confusion standard can extend to confusion of observers who have not actually (yet) purchased the product.Professors Raustiala and Sprigman highlight the vagueness of the statutory text with respect to post-sale confusion, but nonetheless concede that the legislative history "does suggest that Congress intended to extend the Lanham Act's… [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I would like to thank John for his willingness to allow me to publish his article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am by Mary
(2)No reproduction, distribution, display, or performance is authorized under this subsection if - (A) the work is subject to normal commercial exploitation; (B) a copy or phonorecord of the work can be obtained at a reasonable price; or (C) the copyright owner or its agent provides notice pursuant to regulations promulgated by the Register of Copyrights that either of the conditions set forth in subparagraphs (A) and (B) applies [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am by Mary
(2)No reproduction, distribution, display, or performance is authorized under this subsection if - (A) the work is subject to normal commercial exploitation; (B) a copy or phonorecord of the work can be obtained at a reasonable price; or (C) the copyright owner or its agent provides notice pursuant to regulations promulgated by the Register of Copyrights that either of the conditions set forth in subparagraphs (A) and (B) applies [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am by Mary
(2)No reproduction, distribution, display, or performance is authorized under this subsection if - (A) the work is subject to normal commercial exploitation; (B) a copy or phonorecord of the work can be obtained at a reasonable price; or (C) the copyright owner or its agent provides notice pursuant to regulations promulgated by the Register of Copyrights that either of the conditions set forth in subparagraphs (A) and (B) applies [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am by Schachtman
If an expert witness believes that a chemical causes malformation A, this belief is not evidence that the chemical causes malformation B, unless malformation B can be shown to result from malformation A. [read post]