Search for: "John Does I-X"
Results 401 - 420
of 892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
In my last column, I started to explain why criminal justice reform looks the way it does. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 10:26 am
John Samuels of GE asserted in 2010 (at a symposium discussion that was published in Tax Notes) that deferral does NOT reduce profit-shifting by U.S. companies. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to readers of this site. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:24 am
If we do this, in a dystopian future that resembles an X-Files episode, the government could make us embed nefarious surveillance features too. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm
Before I talk about the report itself though, I need to give a little bit of background (well alright, quite a lot of background). [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:15 pm
App’x 396, 422 (6th Cir. 2012)(quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 4:42 pm
As a thought experiment, consider country X where the public service broadcaster (PSB) is not sufficiently protected from government interference. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:43 am
App’x at 297. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:45 am
We can do X. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
John Ball of the American College of Physicians. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 7:13 am
Marin Dell, Head of Electronic and Digital Services I am reading the latest in the alphabetically titled Kinsey Millhone P.I. series, X, by Sue Grafton. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:56 am
So where does that leave us? [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:50 am
But I would suggest that ISIS attempts to create a somewhat different narrative—the redemption of the oppressed. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 4:44 pm
But it is a matter of consensus understanding and centuries-old unbroken practice that the Monarch exercises those powers on the advice of her Ministers—which is a polite way of saying that the elected leadership of Parliament asks the Monarch to do X and the Monarch duly says “I hereby do X. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 7:26 am
Malcolm X and Ho Chi Minh worked there. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm
In the late 60s and early 70s, Justice John M. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 1:20 pm
More on Contact Music here.And one last thing - my email account was hacked yesterday so if I 'emailed' you telling you I was in the Ukraine, I had been mugged and needed funds - errrm, the truth is that I am in the UK, I have not been mugged and I don't need your Money! [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
John W. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:31 pm
According to John C. [read post]