Search for: "Johnson v. Smith*" Results 401 - 420 of 1,035
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2007, 8:42 am
Johnson, 846 F.2d 279, 282 (5th Cir. 1988) (per curiam); see also New York v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Dryden & Ors v Johnson Matthey Plc, heard 27-28 Nov 2017. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:11 pm
People v Myles, 58 AD3d 889, 890-892 [3d Dept 2009] [a consumer of electricity could be guilty of falsifying business records for bypassing the electric meter, causing it to falsely record the amount of electricity used]; People v Johnson, 39 AD3d 338, 339 [1st Dept 2007] [a co-defendant of public assistance applicant could be guilty of falsifying business records of the agency]; People v Smith, 300 AD2d 1145, 1146 [4th Dept 2002] [defendant could… [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
Spisak (08-724) — Judges’ duty to advise jurors on whether unanimity is required in finding factors that bear upon imposing a death sentence. ** Johnson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm by Steve Statsinger
For old-law cases, like this one, the authority to impose post-imprisonment supervised release on a supervised release violation is governed by Johnson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
" NFP criminal opinions today (3): Ernest Johnson III v. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 9:40 am by Tessa Shepperson
 And talking a bit about housing matters too – take a look here…   Further reading If you want to read a bit more about the Johnson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 4:50 am by Alison Rowe
In Dodge, the 1st Court of Appeals noted that the only other Texas court to have addressed the definition of “participant” was the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals in Johnson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  “This session explores the 1902 landmark decision Roberson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 5:18 am by Victoria Clark
  Steve Slick reviewed Loch Johnson’s book “Spy Watching: Intelligence Accountability in the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]