Search for: "Kelly v. Kelly"
Results 401 - 420
of 3,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2021, 8:18 am
See Padgett v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:16 am
Kelly v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of Kelly v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
Last Week in the Courts Judgement was handed down in Parkes v Hall and Ors [2021] EWHC 2824 (QB). [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 3:50 am
I mentioned this on the twitters and was told by a follower I respect that it went on to be inspirational, an exploration of human motivations and growth, greed v. fear v. life situations for people who had never been exposed to inhumanity. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 5:28 am
Kelly B., slip op. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
"* In this action the Appellate Division opined that this standard applies where, as here, a police officer has been placed "on dismissal probation in accordance with a negotiated resolution of disciplinary charges", citing Matter of Cipolla v Kelly, 26 AD3d 171. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
"* In this action the Appellate Division opined that this standard applies where, as here, a police officer has been placed "on dismissal probation in accordance with a negotiated resolution of disciplinary charges", citing Matter of Cipolla v Kelly, 26 AD3d 171. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
.] * In Kelly v Levin, 81 A.D.2d 1005, the Appellate Division held if a jury finds a person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, or the charged individual enters a plea of guilty, a disciplinary hearing officer need hear no other evidence to render a verdict of guilty regarding a parallel charge in an administrative disciplinary proceeding brought against that individual. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
.] * In Kelly v Levin, 81 A.D.2d 1005, the Appellate Division held if a jury finds a person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, or the charged individual enters a plea of guilty, a disciplinary hearing officer need hear no other evidence to render a verdict of guilty regarding a parallel charge in an administrative disciplinary proceeding brought against that individual. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:49 am
In Louisiana Wetlands, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:49 am
In Louisiana Wetlands, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
