Search for: "Land Holdings I, LLC" Results 401 - 420 of 668
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The court then analyzed the opposition’s “unusual circumstances” argument, finding that there was nothing unusual about the facts surrounding water quality, surrounding zoning and land uses or as to the scope of the activity. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:12 am
Coyote Lake Ranch, LLC, No. 07-14-00006-CV, holding that the accommodation doctrine did not apply to restrict the City's use of Coyote's land to develop the City's groundwater under the land. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm by Jamie Dierks
  The lengthy opinion contains various holdings and analyses of interest to CEQA and land use practitioners and their clients; while few break truly new ground, many serve as helpful reminders, primers and interstitial analyses of settled principles. [read post]
25 May 2014, 5:27 am by SHG
Realtors assume the function of land conveyances. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
Undue selectivity in citing precedent can land a lawyer in a heap of trouble. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
[P]laintiffs entered into a contract of sale to sell the property for $1.215 million to a buyer identified elsewhere in these papers as DJD Holdings, LLC, or [DJD] Residential (“DJD”). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 9:20 am by Andrew Delaney
I call this the “do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do” approach when instructing my kids. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:31 am by Don Cruse
While this case was pending, the Court decided AHF-ARBORS AT HUNTSVILLE I, LLC AND AHF-ARBORS AT HUNTSVILLE II, LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:22 am by Submitted Post
  Too much over-analysis at the preliminary stages will hold you back. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:34 am by admin
If I file for bankruptcy, my debts will be discharged, right? [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Reasonable jurisprudence on “limited writ” CEQA remedies emerged (Golden Gate Land Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
While there has been some seemingly contrary authority, the Court in Wellington found most persuasive the fact that (i) there was a relatively recent federal case that supported its holding (In re Frederick Petroleum Corp., 98 B.R. 762, 766 (S.D. [read post]