Search for: "Lange v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 655
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2022, 8:40 am by Jennifer Davis
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943) and Yasui v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:46 am
District Court in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 8:27 am
Yahli Shereshevsky (Michigan/Hebrew) - Back in The Game: The Reengagement of States in International Humanitarian Law Making  Commentator – Moshe Hirsch (Hebrew)   11:00-12:30 Parallel Sessions    Panel IV – Legal Responses to Violence    Chair – Guy Harpaz (Hebrew) Asli Ozcelik-Olcay (Glasgow), The Role of International Law in Peace Negotiations: Certainty, legitimacy, malleability Shiri Krebs (Deakin) – When More… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:25 am by Russ Bensing
A few weeks back I discussed State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 12:21 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
In Turner v Grovit, Case C-159/02, ECLI:EU:C:2004:228, the CJEU prohibited an ASI against proceedings in another Member State, citing the principle of mutual trust among EU courts. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Advanced Cell Diagnostics v Molecular Instruments [2024] EWHC 898 (Pat) On 23 April 2024, Mr Justice Meade handed down his judgment in the dispute between Advanced Cell Diagnostics (ACD) and Molecular Instruments (MI). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 5:18 am
Inc., 41 AD3d 259 [2007]; Skow v Jones, Lang & Wooten Corp., 240 AD2d 194 [1997], lv denied 94 NY2d 758 [1999]). [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
JPM for pre-BK enhancement of position http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Lehman-BK-SDNY-Peck-4-19-12.pdf … B-SDNY's Peck,J. in Lehman v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
There is also the vexed issue of the role of the Lange “political discussion” defence. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]