Search for: "Law v. Cross" Results 401 - 420 of 14,834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
[Richard Epstein, Hoover] Tags: Article V, constitutional law, guns, Oregon, religious liberty, taxes [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:45 pm by Unknown
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Health Insurance; Medicare-Like Rates; Employee Welfare) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlMatter of White v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
We find that legal ideas concerning misrepresentation did not change significantly when they crossed borders. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:05 pm by Unknown
An unfair cross section: Federal jurisdiction for Indian Country crimes dismantles jury community conscience. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:05 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Cross-posted from SCOTUS Blog, where this essay is part of its special Black History Month coverage:In May 1954, Brown v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 9:34 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
MLF cross appeals the order determining that it violated the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
(The following essay by IntLawGrrl Hope Lewis is cross-posted from a SCOTUSblog symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 6:48 am by Eric Goldman
Ziegenhorn Law Enforcement’s Efforts to Scrub COVID “Misinformation” Online Violated the First Amendment–Cohoon v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 8:05 am by Eric Claeys
Federal courts have authority to cross-check state law to deal with the "dead letter" hazard. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 7:16 am by Alexander Sandiforth
The recent decision of the English Commercial court, Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:00 am by INFORRM
The importance of providing full and frank disclosure in without notice applications was recently evidenced in the case of YXB v TNO ([2015] EWHC 826 (QB)) As a result of the claimant’s material non-disclosure, the High Court discharged orders granted in the claimant’s favour and denied a privacy injunction for the future. [read post]